Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 | |
Gruul Aggro | fuya | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12772663 |
Gruul Aggro | clemens gerteiser | 6-2 | None |
Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro , Rakdos Aggro
Rekindling Phoenix ranks #3894 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 76%).
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Rekindling Phoenix is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 1.63 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Rekindling Phoenix has a win rate of 55.4%, making it 15.8% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Magma Spray | Instant | 5 | 48.1% | 0 |
Shock | Instant | 8 | 46.3% | 1 |
Scrapheap Scrounger | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 45.6% | 0 |
Bonecrusher Giant | Creature — Giant | 5 | 45.5% | 0 |
Aethersphere Harvester | Artifact — Vehicle | 6 | 43.9% | 0 |
Pia Nalaar | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 6 | 42.2% | 0 |
Goblin Chainwhirler | Creature — Goblin Warrior | 8 | 41.3% | 1 |
Glorybringer | Creature — Dragon | 11 | 40.1% | 0 |
Lightning Strike | Instant | 8 | 40.1% | 1 |
Hazoret the Fervent | Legendary Creature — God | 7 | 38.6% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Rekindling Phoenix than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lava Coil | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 62.7% | 56.5% | +6.3% |
Goblin Chainwhirler | Creature — Goblin Warrior | 3 | 7 | 55.9% | 53.6% | +2.3% |
Legion Warboss | Creature — Goblin Soldier | 3 | 6 | 55.9% | 56.2% | -0.3% |
Bonecrusher Giant | Creature — Giant | 3 | 5 | 56.0% | 56.5% | -0.5% |
Banefire | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 52.6% | 53.3% | -0.7% |
Shock | Instant | 1 | 8 | 54.2% | 55.7% | -1.5% |
Glorybringer | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 7 | 51.9% | 54.2% | -2.3% |
Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 7 | 52.9% | 56.2% | -3.2% |
Kari Zev, Skyship Raider | Legendary Creature — Human Pirate | 2 | 5 | 50.0% | 54.7% | -4.7% |
Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 6 | 50.0% | 55.7% | -5.7% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono-Red Aggro | 9 | 2.1% | 33.3% |
Izzet Prowess | 5 | 0.5% | 58.5% |
Jeskai Oculus | 4 | 0.5% | 61.5% |
Gruul Aggro | 3 | 0.1% | 50.9% |
1 | 1.6% | 100.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.